Comments

  • Pat, while your RSP vs non-reg comparison has merit in drawing such a stark comparison, I dont think its appropriate comparison for most of your readers, due to the stark fact that investments en masse are complex. You use the worst investment vehicle (which you suggest not to use) of a 10% (?) bond to make an elusive point and forgets the many factors as to invest in what, when, in a persons life.

    I suggest doing a ‘over time’ comparison, using real tax brackets during of a persons career and using real investments that you advocate. While your example tries to push for RSP investments vs non-reg, the $50k available in TFSAs dont even make a mention yet are the most prudent vehicle for wealth accumulation. Unfortunately investing is a bit complex, but in my analysis with my very credible CA, RSPs are a 2nd choice, sometime 3rd choice for investments esp as a person who is in their top earning bracket with a decade or so time before retirement, and if they follow your advice, will always be in the top tax bracket. Darn!

    Let me make brief example. $10,000 pre-tax during early career is probably $ 8000 after-tax when a 25 year old Investor puts it in TFSA and buys a ‘bank’, growing 10% annually and paying a 4% dividend in a DRIP. Using the Rule of 72, 14% doubles about every 5 years, so from age 25 to age 65, that one time $8000 doubles 8 times, becoming $2 million … all tax free.

    Now consider that same $8000 after-tax being invested in the same bank in a std investment account for same period of time … the 10% cap gain growth stays the same, as its not cashed in, however, 4% dividend becomes say 3% after tax, for a total of 13% annualized growth. $8,000 (doubles only 7.3 times) to $1.3 million but is taxed for cap gains at 25%, yielding $770k, and does not have to be cashed in until death, unlike a RIF at age 72.

    Consider the same $10,000 pre-tax growing at 14% inside a RSP for same time … $2.6 million, but now faced with a huge 52% tax bill, whenever its pulled out of a RSP , so yielding $1.25 million. And at age 71, it only gets worse and you cant invest in tax shelters anymore. So, why do an RSP anytime you can do a TFSA or give your grandkids a RESP contribution? As a reader, I urge TSI Wealth to do some practical scenarios looking at an entire wealth profile, as to when to do certain types of investments at different investment levels. I think you will find RSPs are yesterdays news due to the fact that most investors will always be in the top tax bracket as they draw down from a long life of good investing following your wisdom. Mutual funds and RSPs are dead …. esp if an investor can use his or her Granny`s or parent`s unused TFSA!

  • Based on this article , do believe a 34 year old should still take a safety first approach when choosing RRSP investments or is better to be more aggressive?

    • Thanks for your question. For all investors, Pat still thinks you should stick with his three-part program:

      1. Hold mostly high-quality, dividend-paying stocks.

      2. Spread your money out across most if not all of the five main economic sectors: Manufacturing & Industry, Resources & Commodities, Consumer, Finance and Utilities.

      3. Downplay or stay out of stocks in the broker/media limelight

      Pat says that there are a number of difficulties with recommending a model portfolio for all investors. The main one is that each individual has different objectives, acceptable risk levels and so on. For example, conservative or income-seeking investors may want to emphasize utilities and banks for their high and generally secure dividends. More aggressive investors (and that could include the 34-year-old you mentioned) might want to increase their portfolio weightings in resources or manufacturing stocks.

      As well, any model portfolio would need to be continually monitored and updated as individual stocks rise and fall in value and as a percentage of the total.

      In addition, different investors may be more comfortable holding a larger or smaller number of stocks, REITS or ETFs in their portfolios. So, it’s difficult to set any specific number of stocks in a model portfolio.

      However, as mentioned, conservative or income-seeking investors may want to emphasize utilities and Canadian banks for their high, generally secure dividends, but you’ll still want to spread your investments out across the five main economic sectors: Manufacturing & Industry, Resources, Consumer, Finance and Utilities.

Tell Us What YOU Think

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Please be respectful with your comments and help us keep this an area that everyone can enjoy. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Terms of Use, please click here to report it to the administrator.